Rest needed
Just done running 7km at MacRitchie Resrvoir. Actually, not exactly 7km, I did walk for some distance. Man, it was really tiring. Some lousy cross country compeition and I was pulled in for reasons unknown. Anyway, I treat it as a form of training. After all, I was going to build up my stamina.
I recalled 2 points that CO mentioned last Thursday during his newcomers' talk. He said that it's not a matter of the working environment but it depends more on the people you work with. I agree with him completely. A workplace can have ergonomic furniture and equipment, perfect lighting, surreal paintings or works of art being put up. However, if the people there are nasty, working there can be a real terror. After all, humans are inclined to communicate with each other. If there is no communication, then no rapport can be established. Without such rapport, then one will feel lonely and left out. Essentially, life sucks then.
I still remembered the times I had in TDS. It was one of the better times I had. The people there are nice and friendly. It was a far cry from my stay in Alpha wing. All were concerned with their personal achievement, more than anything else. Come to think of it, it wasn't really a good place to hang out. Fortunately, I decided to get out of there.
The other point he mentioned was that he does not care about processes. Instead, he is more result-oriented. I think this should be the way things are. As long as we can produced the desired results, it doesn't really matter how it's being done. This itself is a double-edged sword. One can argue that in order to rise up the ranks, one can trample upon others and use them as stepping stones. Another would say it is best to work hard, get recognized and then get that promotion through 'the right way'. I say there's no difference between the two. The result is the same, isn't it?
To quote an example, think about the times when you did badly for exams. The moment you screw it up, you are immediately clustered with the not-so-good students. Even though you had been getting good grades consistently, you are still being viewed as a poor student. However, you did study hard. In fact, you prepared way ahead of exams. It just so happen that your alarm clock failed you and decided not to wake you up. You wake up late, panicked, rush to school and as a result of your panic, you forgot what you have studied. Does it matter to the teachers? The fact is you did poorly. Who cares how you managed to do badly or why.
Your friend, an infamous slacker got better grades than you. How and why? He cheated. Damn that pile of sewerage! But he did it so skilfully that he got away scot-free and no one has any evidence. Once again, does the teacher bother? No! Fact is, he got good grades! Who bothers how he manage to do it? As long as he get good grades, he is a contributor to the school ranking. And you? You lousy piece of sludge, pulling down the school's ranking with your offending low grades.
I recalled 2 points that CO mentioned last Thursday during his newcomers' talk. He said that it's not a matter of the working environment but it depends more on the people you work with. I agree with him completely. A workplace can have ergonomic furniture and equipment, perfect lighting, surreal paintings or works of art being put up. However, if the people there are nasty, working there can be a real terror. After all, humans are inclined to communicate with each other. If there is no communication, then no rapport can be established. Without such rapport, then one will feel lonely and left out. Essentially, life sucks then.
I still remembered the times I had in TDS. It was one of the better times I had. The people there are nice and friendly. It was a far cry from my stay in Alpha wing. All were concerned with their personal achievement, more than anything else. Come to think of it, it wasn't really a good place to hang out. Fortunately, I decided to get out of there.
The other point he mentioned was that he does not care about processes. Instead, he is more result-oriented. I think this should be the way things are. As long as we can produced the desired results, it doesn't really matter how it's being done. This itself is a double-edged sword. One can argue that in order to rise up the ranks, one can trample upon others and use them as stepping stones. Another would say it is best to work hard, get recognized and then get that promotion through 'the right way'. I say there's no difference between the two. The result is the same, isn't it?
To quote an example, think about the times when you did badly for exams. The moment you screw it up, you are immediately clustered with the not-so-good students. Even though you had been getting good grades consistently, you are still being viewed as a poor student. However, you did study hard. In fact, you prepared way ahead of exams. It just so happen that your alarm clock failed you and decided not to wake you up. You wake up late, panicked, rush to school and as a result of your panic, you forgot what you have studied. Does it matter to the teachers? The fact is you did poorly. Who cares how you managed to do badly or why.
Your friend, an infamous slacker got better grades than you. How and why? He cheated. Damn that pile of sewerage! But he did it so skilfully that he got away scot-free and no one has any evidence. Once again, does the teacher bother? No! Fact is, he got good grades! Who bothers how he manage to do it? As long as he get good grades, he is a contributor to the school ranking. And you? You lousy piece of sludge, pulling down the school's ranking with your offending low grades.